<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Hardware on S3H.com</title>
    <link>https://s3h.com/tags/hardware/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Hardware on S3H.com</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://s3h.com/tags/hardware/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Hardware Asset Management Is the IT Discipline Most Organizations Do Badly</title>
      <link>https://s3h.com/2026/04/18/hardware-asset-management-is-the-it-discipline-most-organizations-do-badly/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://s3h.com/2026/04/18/hardware-asset-management-is-the-it-discipline-most-organizations-do-badly/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Hardware asset management — knowing what physical devices the organization owns, where they are, who has them, what software is installed on them, and when they need to be refreshed or retired — is foundational to almost every other IT function. Security teams need accurate asset inventory to understand their attack surface. Support teams need device configuration data to resolve issues efficiently. Finance teams need asset records for depreciation and insurance. Procurement teams need lifecycle data to plan refresh cycles.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Server Hardware in the Cloud Age Has a Different ROI Calculation</title>
      <link>https://s3h.com/2026/04/01/server-hardware-in-the-cloud-age-has-a-different-roi-calculation/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://s3h.com/2026/04/01/server-hardware-in-the-cloud-age-has-a-different-roi-calculation/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The cloud versus on-premises debate has settled into a more nuanced position than its early framing suggested. The argument that all workloads should move to cloud and that on-premises infrastructure would become obsolete was oversimplified. The organizations that moved all workloads to cloud and discovered that certain workload categories are more expensive to run in cloud than on-premises have been quietly repatriating those workloads for several years.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The current reality is a hybrid infrastructure landscape where the economic decision about where to run a workload depends on its specific characteristics — compute intensity, data volume, access patterns, regulatory requirements, and predictability — rather than on a blanket preference for either delivery model. Server hardware investment in this context requires the same rigor as any capital investment: a specific business case for the specific workloads that the hardware will run.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The IT Budget Allocation Problem That Keeps CIOs Up at Night</title>
      <link>https://s3h.com/2026/03/11/the-it-budget-allocation-problem-that-keeps-cios-up-at-night/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://s3h.com/2026/03/11/the-it-budget-allocation-problem-that-keeps-cios-up-at-night/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The IT budget allocation problem is structural, not mathematical. Organizations that spend the right total amount on IT frequently allocate it incorrectly across the four functional areas — run the business, grow the business, transform the business, and maintain the infrastructure that enables all three — producing technology environments that are simultaneously overspent in some areas and critically underfunded in others.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The allocation pattern that is most common and most damaging is heavy spending on new software and technology initiatives with insufficient investment in the support, security, and infrastructure maintenance that determines whether those investments function reliably. An organization that spends aggressively on digital transformation while deferring network infrastructure refresh, understaffing the helpdesk, and running security with inadequate tooling has not made a strategic trade-off. It has made an accounting error that looks like a strategic choice.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BYOD Policy Has Produced Security Problems Nobody Wants to Own</title>
      <link>https://s3h.com/2026/03/04/byod-policy-has-produced-security-problems-nobody-wants-to-own/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://s3h.com/2026/03/04/byod-policy-has-produced-security-problems-nobody-wants-to-own/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Bring Your Own Device policies were adopted by enterprise IT organizations under pressure from employees and leadership who wanted to use their personal devices for work and did not want to carry two phones. The policies were designed hastily, implemented with tools that were not ready for the management requirements they needed to meet, and left in place with minimal review as the security landscape changed around them. The result is a policy category that most IT security professionals acknowledge as a significant exposure and most organizations decline to address because addressing it requires telling employees they cannot use their personal devices for work.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Network Infrastructure Debt Most Organizations Are Quietly Carrying</title>
      <link>https://s3h.com/2026/02/18/the-network-infrastructure-debt-most-organizations-are-quietly-carrying/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://s3h.com/2026/02/18/the-network-infrastructure-debt-most-organizations-are-quietly-carrying/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Network infrastructure occupies an unusual position in enterprise IT budget conversations. It is essential — nothing in the technology stack works without it — and invisible when functioning correctly. The invisibility is the problem. Network hardware that is approaching or past its end-of-support date, running firmware that has not been updated in years, and operating at utilization levels for which it was not designed accumulates risk silently. The incident that reveals the accumulation is not gradual. It is sudden.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Corporate Laptop Procurement in 2026: What Has Changed and What Still Gets It Wrong</title>
      <link>https://s3h.com/2026/01/21/corporate-laptop-procurement-in-2026-what-has-changed-and-what-still-gets-it-wrong/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://s3h.com/2026/01/21/corporate-laptop-procurement-in-2026-what-has-changed-and-what-still-gets-it-wrong/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Corporate laptop procurement has not kept pace with the changes in how knowledge workers use their devices. The procurement criteria that dominated enterprise laptop purchasing for the past fifteen years — Windows compatibility, Intel processor, specific RAM and storage tiers, corporate image support — are still driving purchasing decisions in organizations where the actual requirements have shifted materially. The mismatch produces laptops that are enterprise-manageable but mediocre for the work employees actually do.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The PC Refresh Cycle Has Been Extended Too Far</title>
      <link>https://s3h.com/2025/10/22/the-pc-refresh-cycle-has-been-extended-too-far/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://s3h.com/2025/10/22/the-pc-refresh-cycle-has-been-extended-too-far/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The four-year PC refresh cycle that became standard in enterprise IT during the 2010s was a budget optimization made under specific conditions: hardware improvements were incremental, Windows 7 was stable, and the marginal productivity gain from newer hardware was not large enough to justify more frequent refresh. Those conditions no longer hold. The PC refresh cycle at many organizations has stretched to five, six, and in some cases seven years without a corresponding assessment of whether the extended cycle is actually saving money.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
