<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Software Development on S3H.com</title>
    <link>https://s3h.com/tags/software-development/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Software Development on S3H.com</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://s3h.com/tags/software-development/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Is Agile Software Development Dead in the Age of AI?</title>
      <link>https://s3h.com/2026/04/24/is-agile-software-development-dead-in-the-age-of-ai/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://s3h.com/2026/04/24/is-agile-software-development-dead-in-the-age-of-ai/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Not dead — but under serious pressure, and some of its foundational assumptions are eroding fast.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Agile was designed around the scarcity of working software. Writing code is slow, human attention is finite, and iteration is expensive. Its rituals — sprints, standups, story points, velocity tracking — exist to manage that scarcity. AI coding assistants like GitHub Copilot, Cursor, and Claude Code dramatically compress the time from intent to working code. When a sprint&amp;rsquo;s worth of boilerplate takes an afternoon, the sprint cadence starts to feel like bureaucracy.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
