<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Support on S3H.com</title>
    <link>https://s3h.com/tags/support/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Support on S3H.com</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://s3h.com/tags/support/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Remote Support Has Changed What Good IT Support Looks Like</title>
      <link>https://s3h.com/2026/04/08/remote-support-has-changed-what-good-it-support-looks-like/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://s3h.com/2026/04/08/remote-support-has-changed-what-good-it-support-looks-like/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The IT support model that existed before 2020 was built around physical proximity. The helpdesk sat in the office building. Employees who needed support walked to the helpdesk or the helpdesk walked to the employee. Hardware issues were resolved by hand. The model had inefficiencies — the helpdesk was idle when nobody needed support, and wait times were unpredictable — but it had a ceiling on support complexity that physical access naturally enforced.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AI in Enterprise IT: Where It Is Actually Saving Time</title>
      <link>https://s3h.com/2026/03/18/ai-in-enterprise-it-where-it-is-actually-saving-time/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://s3h.com/2026/03/18/ai-in-enterprise-it-where-it-is-actually-saving-time/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Enterprise IT has adopted AI-assisted tools at an uneven pace across the four functional areas. The adoption unevenness reflects a genuine difference in the maturity of AI applications across contexts — some IT functions have clear, measurable AI use cases with documented productivity gains, while others have AI vendor claims that have not translated to operational reality at the scale most enterprises require.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The honest assessment of where AI is saving time in enterprise IT is narrow but real: specific use cases within IT support, security operations, and software development assistance have demonstrated consistent productivity gains. The broader claims — AI transformation of IT operations across all functions — remain future-oriented rather than present-tense.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The IT Budget Allocation Problem That Keeps CIOs Up at Night</title>
      <link>https://s3h.com/2026/03/11/the-it-budget-allocation-problem-that-keeps-cios-up-at-night/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://s3h.com/2026/03/11/the-it-budget-allocation-problem-that-keeps-cios-up-at-night/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The IT budget allocation problem is structural, not mathematical. Organizations that spend the right total amount on IT frequently allocate it incorrectly across the four functional areas — run the business, grow the business, transform the business, and maintain the infrastructure that enables all three — producing technology environments that are simultaneously overspent in some areas and critically underfunded in others.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The allocation pattern that is most common and most damaging is heavy spending on new software and technology initiatives with insufficient investment in the support, security, and infrastructure maintenance that determines whether those investments function reliably. An organization that spends aggressively on digital transformation while deferring network infrastructure refresh, understaffing the helpdesk, and running security with inadequate tooling has not made a strategic trade-off. It has made an accounting error that looks like a strategic choice.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Self-Service IT Portals Fail When They Are Designed for the IT Team, Not the Employee</title>
      <link>https://s3h.com/2025/12/17/self-service-it-portals-fail-when-they-are-designed-for-the-it-team-not-the-employee/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://s3h.com/2025/12/17/self-service-it-portals-fail-when-they-are-designed-for-the-it-team-not-the-employee/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The self-service IT portal is one of enterprise IT&amp;rsquo;s most persistent good ideas with consistently poor implementation. The idea is sound: employees who can resolve their own IT issues without contacting the helpdesk reduce the support burden, resolve their issues faster, and build a level of IT self-sufficiency that benefits the organization. The implementation failure is that self-service portals are almost universally designed to make it easy for IT to publish content rather than easy for employees to find solutions to their problems.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The IT Support Ticket Backlog Is a Symptom, Not the Problem</title>
      <link>https://s3h.com/2025/11/05/the-it-support-ticket-backlog-is-a-symptom-not-the-problem/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://s3h.com/2025/11/05/the-it-support-ticket-backlog-is-a-symptom-not-the-problem/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Every IT organization with a persistent ticket backlog treats the backlog as the problem and measures progress by reducing it. This is the wrong frame. A ticket backlog is the visible manifestation of a supply-demand imbalance in IT support capacity — the result of a problem, not the problem itself. Treating the backlog as the target produces solutions that attack the symptom: hiring more helpdesk staff, implementing triage automation to move tickets faster, setting SLA targets that create pressure to close tickets quickly. None of these address why the tickets were created in the first place.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
